Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
I have better things to do.
改编自现实的电影里面的故事情节细节可能与现实不符，如果只是通过电影来铭记现实，那记住的只能是与真实情况有出入的现实。
演员中Lady Gaga演得最好，杰瑞德莱托化妆化得连爹妈都不认了吧。
2.5。導演和所有的演員像是沒有看過完整劇本一樣，機械地呈現著一個個孤立的片段。片段之間的情緒斷裂程度令人咋舌。此外，主創對於通過配樂所達成的間離喜劇效果同樣缺乏自信度。
一群浅薄的文盲拍的廉价美剧质感的电影，可惜每个演员都好认真都在挣扎，然而从剧本到导演特别是艺术指导全都是粗陋的俗人，也是，跟patrizia混在一起用她视角讲故事会出什么好东西？期待意大利出一部反击之作
居然比金钱世界还难看，太浮于表面，人物心理变化可能要补很多资料还能体会。
雷导真的不会失手！这部当然不是最佳水平，毕竟豪门恩怨真人真事，剧本上先天就受限制，但这一部还是比all the money in the world好。我嘎真的要奥提，看完承认天生女演员，虽然戏路不一定宽，但就从明星诞生到这部的稳定输出，真的让人不服不行。其他角色也都很厉害，叙事也很得当，摄影打光更不用说完全就是大导基操，而且雷公很克制，要是真按着坊间版本拍那就狗血的没边了。
改编自现实的电影里面的故事情节细节可能与现实不符，如果只是通过电影来铭记现实，那记住的只能是与真实情况有出入的现实。
阿这，白期待了小半年，预告片已经是最好看的桥段了，以及跟老妈一起看比较长的激情戏稍微有点尴尬。大家演技都不错，但鳖女士跟原型本来就有几分相似之处。整个剧本真的太乱了，还不如八卦号说的有意思。
gaga和driver格外出彩（妈呀坐拥klimt的画！被壕到了（有点旧时代风彩
电影难看是在预期之内的，但没想到一部时装片，这部电影并不带货，每一个单品你都不想拥有。#隔壁的Spencer拍成那个鬼样子，还可以欣赏香奶奶，都已经那么烂了，最后的tom ford环节就不能多拍拍吗？
太悲伤了，家族必须团结一心啊！！！... :(
[3.5/5.0] Jared Leto 演的 Paolo Gucci 超好笑，例如「這個人本人真的有這麼低能嗎ＸＤ」Jack Huston 帥（律師升級ＣＥＯ）。
今年看的第一部比较舒服的电影？雷弟尬尬出演乡村爱情故事，将从情窦初开到中年失意都演绎的比较称职。一点瑕疵是一些转折略显生硬，当然也可能受限于时长。觉得叙事平淡的可能都少不更事，因为真实的生活，就是这么平淡。一切剧变都发生在潜移默化之中。
编剧的锅太大了，把一个充满戏剧张力又奇妙的故事讲得这么平淡，甚至最后收尾真的太草率了一点吧？
甚至一时不知道这个和《小时代》哪个更雷人💧
就是一个家族的盛衰史。接不到雷导抛出来的主旨，拍这部G家传记的动机是不是想告诉大家，女人嘴上说不爱钱，到头来爱的其实是权力，聪明的女人知道有了权力自然就会有源源不绝的钱。为什么女人都想要一个（或多个）古琦包包，代表着我是名流亦或代表我就是话语权？我真的不觉得这部电影是想要讲爱的反面就是恨。对不起，我并不是有意诋毁女人，真的只是不明白此电影的主题。我一直觉得，传记电影的功用大部分可以鼓励观众，勉励观众，感动观众，坚持不懈，从失败中吸取教训，跌倒如何爬起来，看了这部都不知道有什么正面的价值观？分数全打在演员的演技上，尤其嘎嘎女神演得很棒。
Jared Leto来演坏品味版的Alessandro Michele还蛮有趣的。
哈哈哈哈以为富贵宅男很好捞结果自己爱到不行的Lady Gaga实在出乎我意料。男人的变心模版戏，坏事都是太太指挥做的，自己没本事只擅长逃跑，人到中晚年终于变成自己爹的样子也只信自己爹留下的遗言，翻脸不认人和废物点心教科书了。
明明是一个可读性很强的故事，却被拍的如此拖拉无亮点。尤其是这注水的大部分时长里，基本全是gaga神婆般的絮絮叨叨，就更赶客了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
