A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?
I despise this egocentric and incompetent director with his equally arrogant and fragile Poirot with anger management issues. Awful and torturing to watch. Luckily my group won't fall for the same trap again. And get your dirty hands off Agatha Christie's books!
节奏有点问题，体现在内心戏太多和揭露真相时毫无过度，为了悬疑而营造的悬疑气氛太喧宾夺主，不如把故事娓娓道来比较好，服化道太过美式复古，没有了前两版的英式典雅，有些人设的变动是为了紧跟时代潮流和创新嘛，有点没必要。再说演员表演，尤其是被好友抢走未婚夫的演员和老版对比起来那种歇斯底里的愤怒和脆弱完全没有表现出来，太过平凡，以至于结局说她是罪犯甚至是她出谋划策都没有之前的强烈反差感，这版本的波罗太过自大和严肃，没了之前自带的萌，甚至比同演的东方快车谋杀案还要过分。另外实景拍摄更好看，剧本细节也不够严谨，所以还是老版更好。优点是贡献了几句关于婚姻爱情真相的金句，还有就是提示有钱女人远离男人。
就真的没必要翻拍 ┓(´∀`)┏ 以及，别靠近男人，会变得不幸。
原著什么也不记得了当原创剧看还好啊（ 多么现代 幸福的只有拉拉
还来莫名其妙黑白配爱情线，我指的是侦探和Salome，这电影烧钱来玩的吗
阅读过阿加莎的小说，但是这本没有看，旧版也没看，就这部电影来说，算是一个比较工整的作品，观影过程很类似于看阿加莎小说的感觉，波澜不惊的叙述，接着持续不断的重磅炸弹，感觉一些地方挺符合我所脑补的阿加莎小说的状态的。提取出反婚恋，反pua的价值观放在当今还是有意义的，影片中lesbian的感情线也被完整保留，还挺意外的。盖尔加朵撑得起这个角色，很美。艾米汉莫在call me by your name后第一次看他的戏，颜值居然下跌如此严重。＃2022院线电影10，评分:7.0/10。
（剧透）确实节奏有问题，很多段落删掉或许好些。但是布克中弹的时候波洛那本能地一愣，严肃审问突然转变为错愕，一句“我的朋友布克”那种语气让我莫名触动，我把这看作是这个人物的弧光，是这个自恋角色内心柔软的表现，我喜欢这种反差。
前面的爱情元素太多了，后面悬疑氛围没到位，结尾真相来的有点唐突，缺一点递进，把埃及拍的很美。
美轮美奂的尼罗河奇观，足够娱乐性的运镜、原声和叙事，Kenneth Branagh给新版的Death on the Nile注入了很多爱，亦算作最为深情的一版改编了。
景和人都很美，演技也是各个在线，这类片子就是谁都知道结局，就看讲故事的水平和演的如何，但作为悬疑类，破案的过程反而并不精彩而且无趣，然后波洛甲板上逛一圈就破案了？节奏上也不好，前面说了一大堆，后面破案草草了事，这个自导自演的波洛还准备搞多少部
波洛的特色就是胡子……你给他把胡子剃了……
拍得像剧本杀，就是走个过程，每个人都依次出来挨个查一遍，最后再结案，感觉整个过程不够紧凑也不够缜密，没有破案的参与感和沉浸感，有点断裂不够连贯，开头和结尾有些莫名其妙 中间稀里糊涂。
难看到有点离谱搞笑，盖尔加朵cos埃及艳后亮个相然后从梯子下来的时候真是大无语了
基本没有存在的必要，除非是作为埃及旅游宣传片。演技都很尴尬，Gal Gadot快成烂片女王了。
我们啃泥，真真的hopeless romantic，愣是从原著加多了剧情构成四段爱情主题，虽然真的很浮夸………yes是本粉丝都洗不了的浮夸 and里面一些桥段是真的让我绝望地祈祷gal gadot不要再演戏了
为什么这么感人肺腑的爱情电影没能2月14日上映
根东方快车一样，其实重心并没放在推理上，华丽的剧情片
我以为我不是颜控，但是未婚夫男出来之后我想就这也值得俩大美女为他爱得死去活来？
Kenneth Branagh和Annette Bening原来都已经这么老了
跟1978年版本差得不止一星半点！节奏太拖沓了，开场一个小时才死人，是为了让盖尔·加朵戏份更多一些么？加朵把这个富家女演得过分可爱了，以致于让人忽略了她的自私和愚蠢（抢闺蜜男朋友真的很过分哎）西蒙选角失败，主演颜值严重下滑，让人难以置信长成这样也能仙人跳富家女？原著精彩的推理过程被大大压缩，缺乏细节。杰奎琳复仇女神的劲儿还是很对的。但这版波洛也太自恋了，导演疯狂给自己加戏。影片整体基调整得太苦大仇深，强行把爱情线加在好几组人物关系上，殊不知现实生活中很多犯罪的动机就是为了搞钱。人啊，还是不能太贪心，爱情、美貌、钱有一个已经很不容易，有俩就要烧高香了，还想第三个估计就离丧命不远了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
